MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386127617 · doi:10.11159/icepr23.101

Modeling Diffuse Nutrient and Sediment Pollution affecting Lake Palakpakin, Laguna using QSWAT

2023· article· en· W4386127617 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jaztine Danielle Linato, Fellona Sealtielle Anne Sarte, Frederico B. Dela Peña

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on New Technologies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentPollutionEnvironmental scienceNutrientWater pollutionHydrology (agriculture)River pollutionEnvironmental engineeringGeologyWater resource managementEnvironmental chemistryGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringEcologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lake Palakpakin is vulnerable to nutrient and sediment pollution, leading to eutrophication and siltation.Despite existing studies identifying the pollutants and detecting their concentration within the lake, their sources were generally attributed to agricultural activities, considered a nonpoint source.This research modelled the diffuse sediment and nutrient pollution affecting Lake Palakpakin, San Pablo City, Laguna using Soil and Water Analysis Tool (SWAT).This model is physically based, requiring DEM, soil map, LULC map, slope map, and meteorological data as inputs to model physical processes associated with water movement, sediment movement, nutrient cycling, etc. Due to the unsatisfactory statistical results of the calibrated model caused by insufficient hydrological data, the uncalibrated simulation was used.It revealed that the critical source areas for NO3-N and PO4 are found in agricultural lands and areas that are underlain by clay and clay loam.Critical source areas were also found along the stream connecting Palakpakin lake to Laguna de Bay.Meanwhile, higher sediment yields were distinct around Sampaloc Lake and the outlet of the other lakes and in agricultural and urban areas.Moreover, the model exhibited that an increase in precipitation coincides with an increase in sediment, NO3-N and PO4 loading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on New TechnologiesSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207