Production of Bio-Oil by Co-Pyrolysis of the Coffee and Tire Wastes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The escalating energy consumption has underscored the urgent need for viable alternative sources that are renewable and sustainable.Among various industrial processes, pyrolysis has emerged as a prominent method for generating bio-oil, biochar, and syngas.The temperature during pyrolysis assumes a critical role in these processes.Co-pyrolysis, on the other hand, involves utilizing different types of waste as feedstock.The proliferation of coffee waste can be attributed to its high consumption rate, while tire waste represents a plentiful polymeric waste stream.Combining coffee and tire wastes can offer a promising approach for bio-oil production.To attain optimal results, certain conditions must be met.The ideal temperature for bio-oil production is 361.263°C, accompanied by a duration of 15 minutes.Furthermore, it is essential to maintain a plastic content of 78% in the feedstock.By adhering to these specific parameters, the co-pyrolysis process can efficiently convert the mixture of coffee and tire waste into bio-oil, which holds great potential as a renewable energy source.The surge in energy consumption has necessitated the exploration of alternative, sustainable energy sources.Pyrolysis, particularly co-pyrolysis involving coffee and tire wastes, presents a viable solution for generating bio-oil.This approach not only addresses the growing need for renewable energy but also offers a sustainable solution for managing coffee and tire waste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".