MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386128999 · doi:10.46254/in02.20220016

Routing Plan of Migratory Bee Colonies in Honey Production

2022· article· en· W4386128999 on OpenAlexaff
Xintong Qiu, Dr Yuvraj Gajpal, Dr Srimantoorao Appadoo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeekeepingProfit (economics)Honey beeProduction (economics)Computer scienceVehicle routing problemEnvironmental economicsMathematical optimizationRouting (electronic design automation)EconomicsMathematicsEcologyMicroeconomicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commercial apiculture plays an important role because of its contributions to reducing poverty and conserving biodiversity. In this paper, honey production by migratory bee colonies are considered. A group of beekeepers move from one region to another region for harvesting honey. The problem involves finding routing plan for the migratory beekeepers to optimize the total profit of beekeepers, comprehensively considering several constraints. A variable neighbourhood search (VNS) algorithm is proposed to solve the problem. A numerical experiment is performed to test to test the effectiveness of the proposed VNS. The results indicate the feasibility and efficiency of the VNS to achieve good near-optimal solutions while reducing computation time sharply compared to exact algorithms. The outcome of this paper can help related organizations to change traditional production and operation methods, enhancing production efficiency and profit and reducing costs and resource waste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→