Hue-Preserved Quantile-Based Global Contrast Enhancement of Breast Thermograms for Abnormality Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With breast cancer cases rapidly increasing worldwide, thermography serves as a potential imaging modality for early abnormality detection. Breast thermograms are low-resolution pseudocolored images that need contrast enhancement for better differentiability between normal and abnormal breasts. Without hue-preservation, conventional contrast enhancement techniques distort the color spaces and, hence, cannot be applied for contrast enhancement of color images, such as breast thermograms. This letter proposes a novel hue-preserving quantile-based global contrast enhancement (QGCE) of breast thermograms for abnormality detection. A comparative analysis of different types of contrast enhancement techniques with and without hue-preservation is shown. An exhaustive comparison of abnormality detection performance in the presence of different types of noises is also presented. The proposed technique achieves noise resilient detection accuracy of 91%. All evaluations are done using 85 breast thermograms from publicly available datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".