MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386133918 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2023.3299754

Data-Driven Event-Triggered Formation of MIMO Multiagent Systems With Constrained Information

2023· article· en· W4386133918 on OpenAlexafffund
Huarong Zhao, Jinjun Shan, Li Peng, Hongnian Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHigher Education Discipline Innovation Project
KeywordsComputer scienceFadingJacobian matrix and determinantMIMONonlinear systemBipartite graphControl (management)Event (particle physics)Compensation (psychology)Distributed computingControl theory (sociology)Channel (broadcasting)Computer networkTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates the information congestion problems for nonlinear discrete-time multi-input–multi-output multiagent systems (MASs) with fading channels when executing formation tasks. We first establish a virtual linear data model with a time-varying pseudo-Jacobian matrix variable for the MASs, which is independent of the dynamics model. Then, we formulate an event-triggered control scheme and a predictive compensation method to alleviate the communication burden and information congestion effects, respectively. Moreover, we propose two formation schemes for the MASs, considering limited communication resources, fading channels, and random delays to perform formation control and bipartite formation control tasks. The convergences of these two control protocols are strictly proved. Finally, simulations and hardware tests are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207