MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386139119 · doi:10.56397/as.2023.08.06

Art and Counterculture: Shaping Identity Through Expression and Engagement

2023· article· en· W4386139119 on OpenAlex
Donar Rathna

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArt and Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCountercultureAppropriationMainstreamSociologyAestheticsNonconformistExpression (computer science)Context (archaeology)Media studiesPoliticsPolitical scienceEpistemologyArtHistoryLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the dynamic relationship between artistic expression and counterculture, shedding light on how artworks shape, reflect, and convey identities within alternative and nonconformist cultures. Countercultural movements challenge prevailing norms, seeking to establish alternative value systems, and artistic expression becomes a powerful medium through which these identities are both constructed and communicated. Through a historical overview, case studies, and analysis of media representation, the paper examines the intricate interplay between counterculture and art. It also delves into the challenges posed by cultural appropriation, the assimilation of countercultural symbols, and the ongoing struggle to balance authenticity and acceptance. Ultimately, this study seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of how art serves as a dynamic force in defining and shaping countercultural identities within the context of mainstream society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it