Curriculum Ideological and Political Education: An Educational Philosophy with Distinct Chinese Characteristics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As an educational philosophy with distinct Chinese characteristics, curriculum ideological and political education has been widely promoted and applied in major universities in China in recent years. This article takes the teaching practice of ideological and political education in the Financial Management course as an example, illustrates the real scenes of content innovation in the teaching practice process, analyzes the innovative ideas of integrating the ideological and political concepts into professional courses in universities, and expounds the specific content of the reconstructed teaching system and evaluation reform of Financial Management teaching based on the ideological and political concepts, Finally, it summarizes the experience in the ideological and political practice of the financial management course and reflects on the problems encountered and the shortcomings therein, with a view to providing broader ideas and research paradigms for the continuous construction of the Financial Management course in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it