Review of sEMG for Robot Control: Techniques and Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a promising technology that can capture muscle activation signals to control robots through novel human–machine interfaces (HMIs). This technology has already been applied in scenarios such as prosthetic design, assisted robot control, and rehabilitation training. This article provides an overview of sEMG-based robot control, covering two important aspects: (1) sEMG signal processing and classification methods and (2) robot control strategies and methods based on sEMG. First, the article outlines the general steps in sEMG signal processing and summarizes the commonly used methods for data acquisition, pre-processing, and feature extraction. In addition, machine-learning-based pattern recognition methods have been introduced for sEMG signal classification. Subsequently, user intent-based robot control strategies are classified into three categories: full-human continuous control, semi-autonomous continuous control, and discrete control, and their control methods and applicable scenarios are compared. Finally, this article discusses the advantages, disadvantages, and future development prospects of sEMG-based robot control. This review provides a comprehensive overview of sEMG-based robot control, from signal processing and classification methods to robot control strategies and methods, aiming to guide future research on selecting filters, feature sets, and pattern recognition methods and to assist in establishing sEMG-driven robot control frameworks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".