Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| August 01 2023 Review: Warring Visions: Photography and Vietnam, by Thy Phu Thy PhuWarring Visions: Photography and Vietnam.Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2022. 248 pages. $102.96 (hardcover), $26.95 (paperback). Zhuang Wubin Zhuang Wubin Independent Researcher wubin.sg@gmail.com Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar wubin.sg@gmail.com Journal of Vietnamese Studies (2023) 18 (3): 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1525/vs.2023.18.3.158 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Zhuang Wubin; Review: Warring Visions: Photography and Vietnam, by Thy Phu. Journal of Vietnamese Studies 1 August 2023; 18 (3): 158–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/vs.2023.18.3.158 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Vietnamese Studies Search In her new book, Thy Phu puts forth the proposition of warring visions to “denote how Vietnamese communities actively enlisted images to project aesthetic and ideological positions, the stakes of which were nothing less than legitimizing competing claims to the nation” (15). She focuses on the Second Indochina War and its aftermath, which shaped her own personal journey of growing up in Sadec and fleeing Vietnam for Canada after a short interlude at the Pulau Bidong refugee camp in Malaysia. She examines images made during the war and after 1975 in an attempt to redefine the genre of war photography, which has long privileged the spectacular in its iconography. Phu focuses on how diverse communities in Vietnam and North America deployed images in “symbolic combat,” using them, for instance, for “peaceful reconciliation” or a means of “quiet resistance” (15–16). To do so, she considers different materials that would normally elude... You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.093 | 0.052 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".