MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386158126 · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01512

Nanoscale Size Effects on Push–Pull Fe–O Hybridization through the Multiferroic Transition of Perovskite ϵ-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>

2023· article· en· W4386158126 on OpenAlexafffund
Rachel Nickel, Josh Gibbs, Jacob A. J. Burgess, Padraic Shafer, Debora Meira, Cheng‐Jun Sun, J. van Lierop

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Manitoba
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceCanada Foundation for InnovationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMultiferroicsNanoscopic scaleMaterials sciencePhase transitionPerovskite (structure)OctahedronCondensed matter physicsNanoparticleNanotechnologySpin (aerodynamics)Phase (matter)Coupling (piping)Chemical physicsCrystallographyChemistryPhysicsOptoelectronicsCrystal structureFerroelectricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiferroics have tremendous potential to revolutionize logic and memory devices through new functionalities and energy efficiencies. To reach their optimal capabilities will require better understanding and enhancement of the ferroic orders and couplings. Herein, we use ϵ-Fe 2 O 3 as a model system with a simplifying single magnetic ion. Using 15, 20, and 30 nm nanoparticles, we identify that a modified and size-dependent Fe–O hybridization changes the spin–orbit coupling and strengthens it via longer octahedra chains. Fe–O hybridization is modified through the incommensurate phase, with a unique two-step rearrangement of the electronic environment through this transition with attraction and then repulsion of electrons around tetrahedral Fe. Interestingly, size effects disappear in the high-temperature phase where the strongest Fe–O hybridization occurs. By manipulating this hybridization, we tune and control the multiferroic properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano LettersSame topicMultiferroics and related materialsFrench-language works237,207