MobileFuse: Multimodal Image Fusion at the Edge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fusion of multiple images from different modalities is the process of generating a single output image that combines the useful information of all input images. Ideally, the information-rich content of each input image would be preserved, and the cognitive effort required by the user to extract this information should be smaller on the fused image than the one required to examine all images. We propose MobileFuse, an edge computing method targeted at processing large amount of imagery in a bandwidth limited environment using depthwise separable Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). The proposed approach is a hybrid between generative and blending based methods. Our approach can be applied in various fields which require low latency interaction with the user or with an autonomous system. The main challenge in training DNNs for image fusion is the sparsity of data with representative ground truth. Registering images from different sensors is a major challenge in itself, and generating a ground truth from them is another massive one. For this reason, we also propose a multi-focus and multi-lighting framework to generate training dataset using unregistered images. We show that our edge network can perform faster than its state-of-the-art baseline, while improving the fusion quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".