A Real-Time Blind Quality-of-Experience Assessment Metric for HTTP Adaptive Streaming
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In today’s Internet, HTTP Adaptive Streaming (HAS) is the mainstream standard for video streaming, which switches the bitrate of the video content based on an Adaptive BitRate (ABR) algorithm. An effective Quality of Experience (QoE) assessment metric can provide crucial feedback to an ABR algorithm. However, predicting such real-time QoE on the client side is challenging. The QoE prediction requires high consistency with the Human Visual System (HVS), low latency, and blind assessment, which are difficult to realize together. To address this challenge, we analyzed various characteristics of HAS systems and propose a non-uniform sampling metric to reduce time complexity. Furthermore, we design an effective QoE metric that integrates resolution and rebuffering time as the Quality of Service (QoS), as well as spatiotemporal output from a deep neural network and specific switching events as content information. These reward and penalty features are regressed into quality scores with a Support Vector Regression (SVR) model. Experimental results show that the accuracy of our metric outperforms the mainstream blind QoE metrics by 0.3, and its computing time is only 60% of the video playback, indicating that the proposed metric is capable of providing real-time guidance to ABR algorithms and improving the overall performance of HAS. The QoE model is released on https://github.com/lcysyzxdxc/ASPECT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it