MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386162950 · doi:10.46298/cst.12012

Re-inventing port authority in the 21st century: a new agenda for governance

2003· article· en· W4386162950 on OpenAlexaff
Claude Comtois, Brian Slack

Bibliographic record

Venue˜Les œCahiers scientifiques du transport · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPort (circuit theory)Corporate governancePolitical scienceHumanitiesManagementEngineeringPhilosophyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Privatization and deregulation are creating new governance structures, in which the role of the traditional port authority is being diminished and altered. This development raises a series of critical issues. What are the forces that transform the strategies and policies of port authorities? How do port authorities respond to these new opportunities raised by a mutation of maritime activities? What are the options offered to port authorities to adjust to a changing environment? These broad issues are addressed by examining the spatial dimensions of port authorities. Specifically we are concerned with centripetal and centrifugal forces as they affect the evolving governance structures. Particular attention is paid to major functions and competencies that may anchor port administrative responsibilities. Our study demonstrates that port authorities that will modify their governance relationships will contribute to shape the broader maritime industry. La privatisation et la déréglementation ont créé de nouvelles structures de gouvernance dans lesquelles le rôle traditionnel des autorités portuaires est diminué et modifié. Cette problématique soulève une série de questionnements. Quelles sont les forces qui transforment les stratégies et les politiques des autorités portuaires ? Comment les autorités portuaires répondent-elles aux nouvelles opportunités soulevées par une mutation des activités maritimes ? Quelles sont les options qui sont offertes aux autorités portuaires pour s’ajuster à cet environnement de changement ? Nous répondons à ces questions par un examen des dimensions spatiales de l’autorité portuaire. En particulier, nous analysons les forces centripètes et centrifuges qui affectent la gouvernance portuaire. Une attention particulière est accordée aux grandes fonctions et aux compétences qui peuvent ancrer les responsabilités administratives portuaires de l’avenir. Notre étude démontre que les autorités portuaires qui modifieront leur relation de gouvernance contribueront à façonner l’ensemble de l’industrie maritime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.032
Scholarly communication0.0170.020
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜Les œCahiers scientifiques du transportSame topicMaritime Ports and LogisticsFrench-language works237,207