Re-inventing port authority in the 21st century: a new agenda for governance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Privatization and deregulation are creating new governance structures, in which the role of the traditional port authority is being diminished and altered. This development raises a series of critical issues. What are the forces that transform the strategies and policies of port authorities? How do port authorities respond to these new opportunities raised by a mutation of maritime activities? What are the options offered to port authorities to adjust to a changing environment? These broad issues are addressed by examining the spatial dimensions of port authorities. Specifically we are concerned with centripetal and centrifugal forces as they affect the evolving governance structures. Particular attention is paid to major functions and competencies that may anchor port administrative responsibilities. Our study demonstrates that port authorities that will modify their governance relationships will contribute to shape the broader maritime industry. La privatisation et la déréglementation ont créé de nouvelles structures de gouvernance dans lesquelles le rôle traditionnel des autorités portuaires est diminué et modifié. Cette problématique soulève une série de questionnements. Quelles sont les forces qui transforment les stratégies et les politiques des autorités portuaires ? Comment les autorités portuaires répondent-elles aux nouvelles opportunités soulevées par une mutation des activités maritimes ? Quelles sont les options qui sont offertes aux autorités portuaires pour s’ajuster à cet environnement de changement ? Nous répondons à ces questions par un examen des dimensions spatiales de l’autorité portuaire. En particulier, nous analysons les forces centripètes et centrifuges qui affectent la gouvernance portuaire. Une attention particulière est accordée aux grandes fonctions et aux compétences qui peuvent ancrer les responsabilités administratives portuaires de l’avenir. Notre étude démontre que les autorités portuaires qui modifieront leur relation de gouvernance contribueront à façonner l’ensemble de l’industrie maritime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".