MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386169971 · doi:10.4138/atlgeo.2023.007

Petrology, age, and tectonic setting of the Park Spur pluton, Aspy terrane, central Cape Breton Highlands, Nova Scotia, Canada

2023· article· en· W4386169971 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Amanda M. Smith, Sandra M. Barr, Chris E. White, Deanne van Rooyen, Évelyne Sunatori

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geoscience · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAcadia University
KeywordsPlutonGeologyTerraneOrogenyGeochemistryZirconMetamorphic rockTranspressionDevonianShear zonePaleontologyGeomorphologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Park Spur pluton was emplaced in the Aspy terrane of the central Cape Breton Highlands at 374.2 ± 2.9 Ma (U–Pb zircon). It consists mainly of muscovite-biotite monzogranite with small areas of garnet-bearing muscovite monzogranite and abundant pegmatite and aplite dykes. On its northern margin the pluton intruded metamorphic rocks of the Ordovician–Silurian Cape North Group and associated orthogneiss and on the south it intruded low-grade metamorphic rocks of the Silurian Calumruadh Brook Formation. Deformation along the southern margin of the Park Spur pluton is consistent with emplacement during dextral transpression between the Bras d’Or and Aspy terranes. The Late Devonian age combined with S-type petrological characteristics show that the Park Spur pluton and nearby Canal pluton are related to the ca. 375 Ma Black Brook Granitic Suite, all interpreted to have been emplaced during later stages of the Acadian orogeny in Ganderia as a result of delamination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeoscienceSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207