Pijarzy w Nowej Jerozolimie. Pierwsze ćwierćwiecze Szkół Pobożnych w Górze (1675–1700)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1670, the Mazovian village of Góra (now Góra Kalwaria) was renamed to New Jerusalem dueto the foundation made by the Poznań bishop Stefan Wierzbowski (1620–1687). There was a planto shape it in imitation of Jerusalem in the Holy Land which was under the rule of the OttomanEmpire at that time. In this way, the holy city was closer presented to believers living in the centreof Europe and a new purpose of religious pilgrimages was created, which contributed to thegrowth of devotion of the Republic’s society. The Piarists order was one of the orders located inGóra. The official act of the foundation was signed – as the printed source Vinea Christi states – on13 November 1675.However, knowledge about the beginnings of the order – its assets, fathers and brothers, theoldest buildings or schools – has been very scanty until now. This lack resulted from the fact thatthe unit was abolished relatively early – already at the beginning of the nineteenth century – andonly remnants of the source documents concerning it have survived in Polish collections. On theother hand, documentation collected in the General Archive of Religious Schools (Archivio Generaledelle Scuole Pie) in Rome was used for the first time in order to prepare the article. Thissource is rich with information especially on the last quarter of the seventeenth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".