MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386179626 · doi:10.46298/cst.12071

The place of transport in sustainable logistics organisations

2008· article· en· W4386179626 on OpenAlexaff
Corinne Blanquart, Valentina Carbone

Bibliographic record

Venue˜Les œCahiers scientifiques du transport · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBottleneckBusinessSustainabilityPromotion (chess)Welfare economicsCommissionProduction (economics)HumanitiesPolitical scienceOperations managementEconomicsMicroeconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the literature, the link between companies’ transport, logistics and production strategies has been acknowledged for a long time. Public policies have recently started to take into account such bond, specifically through some European Commission’s recommendations in support of co-modality. However, the main intervention areas remain transport related: bottleneck analysis, set up of dedicated railway network, promotion of multimodal transport. In this paper, we argue that transport strategies are the result of multiple constraints, and that they cannot be considered in isolation. They are in particular strongly dependent on logistic processes, and production systems. The place of transport will be thus very different, according to the logistics and production contexts. It will be inevitably modified by the selected sustainability actions in the fields of logistics and production, which evolve over time. Accordingly, the degrees of freedom for companies towards sustainable transport will not be identical for all, certain firms being confronted to more constraints than others.Against such background, an effective promotion of sustainable logistics and transport practices requires that public policies are adapted and conceived according to the specific constraints and characteristics of each production system. Dans la littérature, le lien transport-logistique-stratégies productives des entreprises est affirmé depuis longtemps. L’action publique reconnait ce lien plus récemment au travers notamment des recommandations de la Commission Européenne en faveur de la co-modalité. Mais les leviers privilégiés d’action se situent toujours principalement dans le champ du transport : analyse des goulets d’étranglement, mise en place d’un réseau ferroviaire dédié, promotion du transport multimodal.Notre propos est ici d’insister sur le fait que les stratégies de transport sont toujours le fruit de contraintes multiples, et qu’elles ne peuvent être considérées isolément. Elles sont notamment fortement dépendantes des processus logistiques, et des systèmes productifs. La place du transport sera donc très différente, en fonction des contextes, logistique et productif. Elle sera inévitablement modifiée par les choix de durabilité retenus, dans la mesure où la logistique et la production évolueront elles aussi. Mais les marges de manœuvre des entreprises en faveur de la durabilité ne seront pas identiques pour toutes, certaines firmes étant plus contraintes que d’autres. Promouvoir la logistique et le transport durables implique dès lors d’adapter l’action publique au contexte propre aux différentes chaînes productives et à leurs contraintes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜Les œCahiers scientifiques du transportSame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207