Comparing individual antimicrobial resistant and multi-drug resistant Salmonella enterica across serotypes, sampling sources, sampling periods, and food animal types in the United States (2014–2018)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella enterica profiles from three sampling sources cecal contents, HACCP (during processing), and retail meat using phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility and serotype data gathered from 2014 and 2018. Antimicrobial resistance data for 29 major Salmonella serotypes from three sampling sources and associated food animal types (cattle, swine, chicken, and turkey) were obtained from the database of the United States National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we compared individual and multi-drug resistance (MDR) in Salmonella enterica between the three sampling sources, food animal types, sampling period, and Salmonella serotypes. Across the three sources and throughout the sampling period, the recovery of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella enterica - including MDR, MDR-AmpC, and ACSSuT - among food animal types were dependent on the sampling period and, in some cases, sampling sources and period for the selected antimicrobials. The predicted probability of antimicrobial resistance was greater in Salmonella serotypes from turkey compared to other food animal types, conditional on sampling sources. Ceftriaxone-resistant (OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.69-0.99), and Sulfisoxazole-resistant (OR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98) Salmonella serotypes were less likely to be recovered from the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) sources than with the cecal sources. Except for Salmonella serotypes Dublin and Newport, most of the Salmonella serotypes were less likely to be resistant to the selected antimicrobials, or found as MDR, compared to serotype Typhimurium. This study offers an integrated view on the predicted probability of MDR Salmonella serotypes, as well as insights into which serotypes are persistent, emerging or declining across sampling sources and food animal types in the United States.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".