MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386215876 · doi:10.2196/51609

Correction: Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation

2023· erratum· en· W4386215876 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Melissa Voth, Shannon Chisholm, Hannah Sollid, Chelsea Jones, Lorraine Smith‐MacDonald, Suzette Brémault‐Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2023
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile appsResilience (materials science)Quality (philosophy)mHealthPublic healthEngineeringPsychologyInternet privacyComputer scienceMedicineWorld Wide WebNursingPsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/26453.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.260
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.260
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0110.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.512
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealth→Same topicResilience and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→