Quality of the Literacy Environment in Quebec Preschool and Kindergarten Classrooms and Children's Engagement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude analyse les relations entre l'environnement éducatif relatif à l'émergence de l'écrit et l'engagement des enfants à l'éducation préscolaire au Québec (Canada). Trente (30) enseignantes et 150 enfants ont participé à l'étude. La qualité de l'environnement éducatif et l'engagement des enfants ont été directement observés en classe. La qualité de l'environnement éducatif est généralement considérée de base, tandis que l'engagement des enfants se situe à un niveau faible en ce qui concerne les interactions avec les enseignantes, les pairs et les interactions négatives, et d'un niveau moyen pour ce qui est de l'orientation envers la tâche. Aucune association significative n'a été trouvée entre les variables de l'environnement éducatif et l'engagement des enfants, mais certaines variables de contrôle (en particulier le statut socio-économique, l'âge de l'enfant et la taille du groupe) s’avèrent significativement associées à \ncertaines dimensions de l'engagement des enfants. Les résultats sont discutés en relation avec les recherches récentes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".