A Novel Machine-Learning Approach to Predict Stress-Responsive Genes in Arabidopsis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study proposes a hybrid gene selection method to identify and predict key genes in Arabidopsis associated with various stresses (including salt, heat, cold, high-light, and flagellin), aiming to enhance crop tolerance. An open-source microarray dataset (GSE41935) comprising 207 samples and 30,380 genes was analyzed using several machine learning tools including the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE), information gain (IG), ReliefF, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), along with various classifiers (BayesNet, logistic, multilayer perceptron, sequential minimal optimization (SMO), and random forest). We identified 439 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), of which only three were down-regulated (AT3G20810, AT1G31680, and AT1G30250). The performance of the top 20 genes selected by IG and ReliefF was evaluated using the classifiers mentioned above to classify stressed versus non-stressed samples. The random forest algorithm outperformed other algorithms with an accuracy of 97.91% and 98.51% for IG and ReliefF, respectively. Additionally, 42 genes were identified from all 30,380 genes using LASSO regression. The top 20 genes for each feature selection were analyzed to determine three common genes (AT5G44050, AT2G47180, and AT1G70700), which formed a three-gene signature. The efficiency of these three genes was evaluated using random forest and XGBoost algorithms. Further validation was performed using an independent RNA_seq dataset and random forest. These gene signatures can be exploited in plant breeding to improve stress tolerance in a variety of crops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".