Active disturbance rejection control: an application to continuous microalgae photobioreactors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Mathematical modelling is a widely employed approach for investigating the growth behaviour of microalgae. As a result, the development of model‐based controllers to regulate process variables has garnered increasing attention. However, despite the significant efforts invested in this area, control performance can be adversely affected by unmodelled dynamics and disturbances. RESULTS Two active disturbance rejection controllers (ADRC) were designed to enable robust tracking of biomass concentration in continuous microalgae photobioreactors, with reduced reliance on the mathematical model of the system. The controllers were tuned to achieve a nonovershoot response and minimize settling time based on the culture's characteristics. Simulations were performed using optimal setpoints specific to each model. The results showcased a maximum output signal deviation of ±2.2%, ±7.8% and ± 7.62% for the Dunaliella tertiolecta , Isochrysis affinis galbana and Chlorella vulgaris models, respectively, regardless of the presence of simulated disturbances. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study significantly contribute to the advancement of the field of sustainable microalgae production. By introducing less dependent model‐based controllers, this research enhances the feasibility of implementing robust control strategies. These controllers require only knowledge of the equation system's order and the control gain function, simplifying the design process. This approach effectively addresses control performance degradation arising from unmodelled dynamics and disturbances. The ability to maintain desired process variables through ADRC controllers not only ensures improved control performance, but also supports the cultivation of specific microalgal species, when an accurate model is not available, thus promoting the overall progress and viability of microalgae biomass production. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".