CULTURAL AWARENESS, MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION OF PUTO LATIK FESTIVAL TO BINAN CITY RESIDENTS, LAGUNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Puto Latik Festival in Binan City, Laguna, which is a contemporary commemoration of the traditional feast of San Isidro Labrador, the Patron Saint of Farmers, is one of the city's cultural highlights. While "Latik" refers to the traditional dance "Maglalatik", which originated in the city, "Puto" refers to the well-known Puto Biñan. To honor the "Magpuputo" of Biñan's contributions to the pride and identity of the city, this study investigates the Cultural Awareness, Motivation and Satisfaction of Puto Latik Festival to the Residents of Biñan City, Laguna. Analyzing 381 responses in total with 127 responses each barangay from the immediate residents of three barangays, namely, Barangay Canlalay, Barangay, Poblacion and Barangay San Joseph where the festival was held. This study investigated how Cultural Awareness, Motivation, and Satisfaction affect one another using information gathered from locals that attend the Puto Latik festival. The structural analysis reveals that there is significant and no significant difference in the respondents’ assessment of the festival satisfaction, motivation and cultural awareness depending on the respondent’s demographic profile. When grouped by gender and educational attainment, the null hypothesis of no significant is not rejected however, when grouped by age there is a significant difference in festival motivation and by location the three factors have a significant difference. The results showed that community benefits and cultural and educational advantages are good predictors of residents' subjective measures of motivation, satisfaction and cultural awareness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".