Ensemble Model Based on Hybrid Deep Learning for Intrusion Detection in Smart Grid Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Smart Grid aims to enhance the electric grid's reliability, safety, and efficiency by utilizing digital information and control technologies. Real-time analysis and state estimation methods are crucial for ensuring proper control implementation. However, the reliance of Smart Grid systems on communication networks makes them vulnerable to cyberattacks, posing a significant risk to grid reliability. To mitigate such threats, efficient intrusion detection and prevention systems are essential. This paper proposes a hybrid deep-learning approach to detect distributed denial-of-service attacks on the Smart Grid's communication infrastructure. Our method combines the convolutional neural network and recurrent gated unit algorithms. Two datasets were employed: The Intrusion Detection System dataset from the Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity and a custom dataset generated using the Omnet++ simulator. We also developed a real-time monitoring Kafka-based dashboard to facilitate attack surveillance and resilience. Experimental and simulation results demonstrate that our proposed approach achieves a high accuracy rate of 99.86%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it