The role of internal climate variability on future streamflow projections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uncertainty about the future impacts of climate change represents a significant barrier to implementing adaptation measures. This work explores the impact of internal climate variability on streamflow projections for 133 catchments across the eastern and northeastern United States. Using data from a single model initial-condition large ensemble (SMILE) at high spatial and temporal resolution, this work assesses the magnitude of anthropogenic climate change and internal climate variability on projected future streamflow. The impact of catchment size is studied by grouping catchments into three different size classes (less than500 km 2 , between 500 and 1000 km 2 , and greater than 1000 km 2 ). Results show that in a warmer climate, low to middle quantiles of future streamflow will systematically decrease, while the upper quantiles will increase. Increases are largest for more extreme streamflow indices. Using three different approaches, the role of internal variability is studied to estimate the time of emergence (TOE). In this case, results show that the climate change signal of extreme floods and droughts emerges later than that of median flow quantiles, even though the changes for floods as droughts is more significant. There is a clear relationship between catchment size and TOE, with small catchments seeing an earlier TOE for floods, and a later one for droughts. These results provide insight into adaptation times for small to large watersheds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".