Large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow from general rigid bead-rod theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oscillatory shear flow, performed at small-amplitude, interrogates polymeric liquids in their equilibrium states. The fluid responds in sinusoidal shear stress waves whose amplitude and phase lead depend on the dimensionless frequency (called the Deborah number). By contrast, this same flow field, performed at large-amplitude, probes departures from the equilibrium state, and the fluid responds with shear stress in the form of a Fourier series, whose component amplitudes and phase leads depend on both the dimensionless frequency (called the Deborah number) and the dimensionless shear rate amplitude (called the Weissenberg number). The physics of these departures from equilibrium in an oscillatory shear flow may be explained by (i) chain disentanglement or (ii) motion along the polymer chain axes (called reptation) or (iii) macromolecular orientation. Of these radically different and yet otherwise equally effective approaches, only (iii) allows the macromolecular structure to be varied arbitrary so that the effect of molecular architecture on the rheology can be explored. Though much has been written about a large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow, we understand little about the role of molecular structure on the measured behaviors, and this has limited its usefulness. In this work, we explain the higher harmonics of both the shear stress (first and third), the first normal stress differences (zeroth, second, and fourth), and the second normal stress differences (zeroth and second) arriving at analytical expressions for all three. These expressions, written in dimensionless form, express the dimensionless rheological responses in large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow in terms of the ratio of the two principal macromolecular moments of inertia. To get these expressions, we derive the first five terms of the orientation distribution function, by solving the general diffusion equation in Euler coordinates. We then integrate in phase space with this orientation result to arrive at our expression for the first seven terms of the polymer contribution to the extra stress tensor. From this tensor, we next write down the Fourier coefficients for the shear stress responses, and the normal stress difference responses, in large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow for a suspension of macromolecules sculpted from a rigid bead-rod structure of any arbitrary axisymmetric shape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".