MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386226332 · doi:10.1063/5.0165131

Large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow from general rigid bead-rod theory

2023· article· en· W4386226332 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Myong Chol Pak, A. Jeffrey Giacomin, M. A. Kanso, Hak Chol Pak

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsShear flowDimensionless quantityDeborah numberShear stressAmplitudeClassical mechanicsMechanicsShear (geology)Shear rateCritical resolved shear stressRheologyFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsOpticsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oscillatory shear flow, performed at small-amplitude, interrogates polymeric liquids in their equilibrium states. The fluid responds in sinusoidal shear stress waves whose amplitude and phase lead depend on the dimensionless frequency (called the Deborah number). By contrast, this same flow field, performed at large-amplitude, probes departures from the equilibrium state, and the fluid responds with shear stress in the form of a Fourier series, whose component amplitudes and phase leads depend on both the dimensionless frequency (called the Deborah number) and the dimensionless shear rate amplitude (called the Weissenberg number). The physics of these departures from equilibrium in an oscillatory shear flow may be explained by (i) chain disentanglement or (ii) motion along the polymer chain axes (called reptation) or (iii) macromolecular orientation. Of these radically different and yet otherwise equally effective approaches, only (iii) allows the macromolecular structure to be varied arbitrary so that the effect of molecular architecture on the rheology can be explored. Though much has been written about a large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow, we understand little about the role of molecular structure on the measured behaviors, and this has limited its usefulness. In this work, we explain the higher harmonics of both the shear stress (first and third), the first normal stress differences (zeroth, second, and fourth), and the second normal stress differences (zeroth and second) arriving at analytical expressions for all three. These expressions, written in dimensionless form, express the dimensionless rheological responses in large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow in terms of the ratio of the two principal macromolecular moments of inertia. To get these expressions, we derive the first five terms of the orientation distribution function, by solving the general diffusion equation in Euler coordinates. We then integrate in phase space with this orientation result to arrive at our expression for the first seven terms of the polymer contribution to the extra stress tensor. From this tensor, we next write down the Fourier coefficients for the shear stress responses, and the normal stress difference responses, in large-amplitude oscillatory shear flow for a suspension of macromolecules sculpted from a rigid bead-rod structure of any arbitrary axisymmetric shape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207