Amyloid beta plaque accumulation with longitudinal [18F]AZD4694 PET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: [18F]AZD4694 is an amyloid beta (Aβ) imaging agent used in several observational studies and clinical trials. However, no studies have yet published data on longitudinal Aβ accumulation measured with [18F]AZD4694. Methods: We assessed 146 individuals who were evaluated with [18F]AZD4694 at baseline and 2-year follow-up. We calculated annual rates of [18F]AZD4694 change for clinically defined and biomarker-defined groups. Results: Cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults displayed subtle [18F]AZD4694 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) accumulation over the follow-up period. In contrast, Aβ positive CU older adults displayed higher annual [18F]AZD4694 SUVR increases. [18F]AZD4694 SUVR accumulation in Aβ positive mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia was modest across the neocortex. Discussion: Larger increases in [18F]AZD4694 SUVR were observed in CU individuals who had abnormal amyloid positron emission tomography levels at baseline. [18F]AZD4694 can be used to monitor Aβ levels in therapeutic trials as well as clinical settings, particularly prior to initiating anti-amyloid therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".