MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386227645 · doi:10.1093/ehjopen/oead078

Predicting poor neurological outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using neuron-specific enolase and neurofilament light chain in patients with and without haemolysis

2023· article· en· W4386227645 on OpenAlex
Yusuf Abdi Isse, Ruth Frikke‐Schmidt, Sebastian Wiberg, Johannes Grand, Laust Emil Roelsgaard Obling, Anna Sina P. Meyer, Jesper Kjærgaard, Christian Hassager, M Meyer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Open · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHjerteforeningen
KeywordsEnolaseHaemolysisMedicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicineImmunologyImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims Hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a common complication and a major cause of death. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) are released after brain injury and elevated concentrations of both are associated with poor neurological outcome. We explored the influence of haemolysis on the prognostic performance of NSE and NfL. Methods and results The study is based on post hoc analyses of a randomized, single-centre, double-blinded, controlled trial (IMICA), where comatose OHCA patients of presumed cardiac cause were included. Free-haemoglobin was measured at admission to quantify haemolysis. NSE and NfL were measured after 48 h to estimate the extent of brain injury. Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (MoCA) was assessed to evaluate neurocognitive impairments. Seventy-three patients were included and divided into two groups by the median free-haemoglobin at admission. No group differences in mortality or poor neurological outcome were observed. The high-admission free-haemoglobin group had a significantly higher concentration of NSE compared to the low-admission free-haemoglobin group (27.4 µmol/L vs. 19.6 µmol/L, P = 0.03), but no differences in NfL. The performance of NSE and NfL in predicting poor neurological outcome were high for both, but NfL was numerically higher [area under the ROC (AUROC) 0.90 vs. 0.96, P = 0.09]. Furthermore, NfL, but not NSE, was inversely correlated with MoCA score, R2 = 0.21, P = 0.006. Conclusion High free-haemoglobin at admission was associated with higher NSE concentration after 48 h, but, the performance of NSE and NfL in predicting poor neurological outcome among OHCA patients were good regardless of early haemolysis. Only elevated NfL concentrations were associated with cognitive impairments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it