MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386229710 · doi:10.33844/cjm.2023.6027

Social Support for Birthmothers Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2023· article· en· W4386229710 on OpenAlex
Jiyeon Park, Peter Anto Johnson, John C. Johnson, A. A. Mardon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicLonelinessHarmCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Social isolationIsolation (microbiology)Social supportPsychologySocial distanceMedicineSocial psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Giving birth is not a simple event and requires much attention, care, and support to result in a positive birth experience. However, the process of giving birth changed significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the spread of the virus, the uncertainty of the virus, and the numerous restrictions implemented. These led to isolation, loneliness, a lack of communication, loss of control over the body, and little or no contribution to decision-making for the new birth mother. This, as well as a lack of social support, can harm a mother’s and baby’s mental and physical health. Thus, this article explores the importance of social support and its role before the COVID- 19 pandemic, as well as the changes that have occurred in the birth process during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it