Reduced tubuloglomerular feedback activity and absence of its synchronization in a connexin40 knockout rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) is the negative feedback component of renal blood flow (RBF) autoregulation. Neighbouring nephrons often exhibit spontaneous TGF oscillation and synchronization mediated by endothelial communication, largely via connexin40 (Cx40). Methods: We had a knockout (KO) rat made that lacks Cx40. One base pair was altered to create a stop codon in exon 1 of Gja5, the gene that encodes Cx40 (the strain is WKY-Gja55em1Mcwi). Blood pressure (BP)-RBF transfer functions probed RBF dynamics and laser speckle imaging interrogated the dynamics of multiple efferent arterioles that reach the surface (star vessels). Results: The distribution of wild type (WT), heterozygote, and KO pups at weaning approximated the Mendelian ratio of 1:2:1; growth did not differ among the three strains. The KO rats were hypertensive. BP-RBF transfer functions showed low gain of the myogenic mechanism and a smaller TGF resonance peak in KO than in WT rats. Laser speckle imaging showed that myogenic mechanism had higher frequency in KO than in WT rats, but similar maximum spectral power. In contrast, the TGF frequency was similar while peak power of its oscillation was much smaller in KO than in WT rats. In WT rats, plots of instantaneous TGF phase revealed BP-independent TGF synchronization among star vessels. The synchronization could be both prolonged and widespread. In KO rats TGF synchronization was not seen, although BP transients could elicit short-lived TGF entrainment. Discussion: Despite the reduced TGF spectral power in KO rats, there was sufficient TGF gain to induce oscillations and therefore enough gain to be effective locally. We conclude that failure to synchronize is dependent, at least in part, on impaired conducted vasomotor responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".