Long-term Natural History of Pediatric Dominant and Recessive <i>RYR1</i> -Related Myopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: -related myopathies. METHODS: -related myopathies seen between 1992-2019 in 2 large UK centers. Patients were identified, and data were collected from individual medical records. RESULTS: -related myopathy, 31 recessive, 6 de novo dominant, and 3 uncertain inheritance. Median age at the first and last appointment was 4.0 and 10.8 years, respectively. Fifteen% of patients older than 2 years never walked (5 recessive, 4 de novo dominant, and 1 dominant patient) and 7% lost ambulation during follow-up. Scoliosis and spinal rigidity were present in 30% and 17% of patients, respectively. Respiratory involvement was observed in 22% of patients, and 12% needed ventilatory support from a median age of 7 years. Feeding difficulties were present in 30% of patients, and 57% of those needed gastrostomy or tube feeding. There were no anesthetic-induced malignant hyperthermia episodes reported in this cohort. We observed a higher prevalence of prenatal/neonatal features in recessive patients, in particular hypotonia and respiratory difficulties. Clinical presentation, respiratory outcomes, and feeding outcomes were consistently more severe at presentation and in the recessive group. Conversely, longitudinal analysis suggested a less progressive course for motor and respiratory function in recessive patients. Annual change in forced vital capacity was -0.2%/year in recessive vs -1.4%/year in dominant patients. DISCUSSION: -related myopathies that may inform management and provide essential milestones for future therapeutic interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".