Tree Health Assessment from UAV Images: Improving Object Detection and Classification Using Hard Negative Mining and Semi-Supervised Autoencoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orchard tree inventory has been an essential step to obtain up-to-date information for effective tree treatments and crop insurance purposes. Inventorying trees is often performed manually through fieldwork surveys, which are generally time-consuming, costly, and subject to errors. Motivated by the latest advances in UAV imagery and deep learning, we propose a new framework for individual tree detection and health assessment. We adopt a divide-and-conquer approach to address the problem of orchard trees' health assessment in two stages. First, we build a tree detection model based on a hard negative mining strategy to improve object detection. In the second stage, we address the health classification problem using a new convolutional autoencoder architecture mainly designed to extract relevant features. The performed experiments demonstrate the robustness of the proposed framework for orchard tree health assessment from UAV images. In particular, our framework achieves an F1-score of 86.24% for tree detection and an overall accuracy of 98.06% for tree health assessment. Moreover, our work could be generalized for a wide range of UAV applications involving a detection/classification process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".