Fast Fine-Tuning Using Curriculum Domain Adaptation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable accuracy in various downstream tasks. However, their training and fine-tuning are challenging due to several factors, such as limited computational resources, extended training and fine-tuning times, and over-fitting due to small datasets. To address these challenges, we propose a three-stage fast fine-tuning method that efficiently trains DNNs for edge devices. Our method combines curriculum learning and domain adaptation techniques to accelerate training while achieving comparable performance. First, we develop a data curriculum approach, which ranks the dataset according to difficulty and split it into the source domain (containing easy data) and the target domain (containing difficult data). Second, we adapt the pretrained model from the source domain to the target domain using an unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) method called Deep CORAL. Finally, we continue training the adapted model on the source domain with fewer epochs. Our method achieves high accuracy quickly on various modern neural network architectures and datasets such as CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and CINIC-10.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".