Class Instance Balanced Learning for Long-Tailed Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The long-tailed image classification task remains important in the development of deep neural networks as it explicitly deals with large imbalances in the class frequencies of the training data. While uncommon in engineered datasets, this imbalance is almost always present in real-world data. Previous approaches have shown that combining cross-entropy and contrastive learning can improve performance on the long-tailed task, but they do not explore the tradeoff between head and tail classes. We propose a novel class instance balanced loss (CIBL), which reweights the relative contributions of a cross-entropy and a contrastive loss as a function of the frequency of class instances in the training batch. This balancing favours the contrastive loss for more common classes, leading to a learned classifier with a more balanced performance across all class frequencies. Furthermore, increasing the relative weight on the contrastive head shifts performance from common (head) to rare (tail) classes, allowing the user to skew the performance towards these classes if desired. We also show that changing the linear classifier head with a cosine classifier yields a network that can be trained to similar performance in substantially fewer epochs. We obtain competitive results on both CIFAR-100-LT and ImageNet-LT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".