Impact of Socially Responsible Business Behavior on Implementing the Principles of Sustainable Development (Experience of Large Business)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of business social responsibility often revolves around determining factors that influence the orientation and content of social responsibility programs.This study aims to ascertain the impact of large businesses' social responsibility on implementing sustainable development principles in Russia and Kazakhstan, specifically in the oil and gas industry.Through an expert survey, the paper identifies key efforts in conducting socially responsible business, major components of business social responsibility, and critical arguments for adopting a socially responsible policy.An analysis of oil and gas companies' corporate websites reveals principles of sustainable development implemented by large Kazakh and Russian companies.The findings suggest that corporate social responsibility underpins the principles of sustainable development and the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.Such responsibility creates opportunities for improving human life quality, environmental protection, and rational resource usage at the regional level.Therefore, enhancing corporate social responsibility is recommended for businesses, regardless of their operational scope.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it