MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386247389 · doi:10.1167/jov.23.9.5736

Probing the role of bypass connections in core object recognition by chemogenetic suppression of macaque V4 neurons

2023· article· en· W4386247389 on OpenAlexaff
Kohitij Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacaqueNeuroscienceVisual cortexComputer scienceObject (grammar)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionCortex (anatomy)Computer visionBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The macaque ventral visual pathway is typically modeled as a series of hierarchically organized cortical areas that successively transform the retinal input into visual object-based linearly separable neural representations. The most behaviorally explicit form of this representation has been discovered in the macaque inferior temporal (IT) cortex. However, each stage of the ventral stream (e.g., areas V1, V2) projects to multiple other areas in the brain. In addition, many projections from early visual areas (e.g., V1, V2) bypass area V4 and connect directly to the IT cortex. Therefore, the underlying neural circuitry is far more complex than a feedforward architecture. Here I provide evidence for the functional relevance of such bypass connections during object recognition. I hypothesized that images that require fewer transformations to generate linearly separable object representations most benefit from bypass connections. This would allow fast object detection under time-sensitive decision-making like assessing predatory threats. Using deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs), I categorized 10,000 images (10 objects, 1000 images/object) into two categories (with equal categorization performance at the final layer). The “slow-evolved” images required more transformations to reach their final object classification accuracy than the “fast-evolved” images. To test this hypothesis in the primate ventral stream, I expressed inhibitory DREADDs within a 5x5 mm subregion of the V4 cortex via multiple viral injections (AAV8-hSyn-hM4Di-mCherry; two macaques). I recorded from multi-electrode arrays implanted over the transfected V4 and downstream IT cortex while monkeys’ performed object discrimination tasks. Successful V4 neural suppression (~20%) ensured I could produce a partial lesion within the ventral stream hierarchy. Interestingly, I observed that monkeys’ accuracies were significantly higher for “fast-evolved” compared to “slow-evolved” images (only when the objects overlapped with the transfected V4 receptive field). These results suggest that bypass connections allow "fast-evolved" images to retain high object recognition accuracy despite a V4 lesion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VisionSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207