Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chapter 7 starts out with a physics motivation, as well as a mathematical statement of the problems that will be tackled in later sections. Newton-Cotes integration methods are first studied ad hoc, via Taylor expansions and, second, building on the interpolation machinery of the previous chapter. Standard techniques like the trapezoid rule and Simpson’s rule are introduced, including the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula. The error behavior is employed to produce an adaptive-integration routine and also, separately, to introduce the topic of Romberg integration. The theme of integration from interpolation continues, when Gauss-Legendre quadrature is explicitly derived, including the integration abscissas, weights, and error behavior. Emphasis is placed on analytic manipulations that can help the numerical evaluation of integrals. The chapter then turns to Monte Carlo, namely stochastic integration: this is painstakingly introduced for one-dimensional problems, and then generalized to the real-world problem of multidimensional integration. The chapter is rounded out by a physics project, on variational Monte Carlo for many-particle quantum mechanics, and a problem set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".