MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386249061 · doi:10.1167/jov.23.9.5515

V4 neurons are tuned for local and non-local features of natural planar shape

2023· article· en· W4386249061 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy D. Oleskiw, James H. Elder, Ingo Fruend, Gerick M. Lee, Andrew J. Sutter, Anitha Pasupathy, Eero P. Simoncelli, J. Anthony Movshon, Lynne Kiorpes, Najib J. Majaj

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMorphological variations and asymmetry
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurvatureBiological systemPlanarShape analysis (program analysis)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometryComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planar shape, i.e., the silhouette contour of a solid body, carries rich information important for object recognition, including both local (curvature) and global shape cues. While curvature-selective neurons have been identified in area V4 of primate, it remains unclear whether a) curvature is the best way to characterize the shape selectivity of these neurons and b) whether selectivity is limited to local shape. Here we employ a unique array of shape stimuli to dissociate tuning for local and global shape properties. These stimuli have been used previously to identify an intriguing congruence between the curvature statistics of natural shape and the population response of shape-selective V4 neurons. However, this evidence is indirect, as neural curvature selectivity was not analyzed at the single-neuron level. To address these limitations, we first assess how model neurons, trained on single-unit V4 responses, encode the curvatures of various shape stimuli. A mutual information analysis reveals that these neurons are tuned to extract information more efficiently from shapes with natural curvature distributions, indicating a tuning to the ecological statistics of curvature. Second, to more directly measure neuronal tuning for natural shape we recorded activity from area V4 of a juvenile Macaca nemestrina observing natural and synthetic shapes. Consistent with our model neuron analysis, we found that synthetic shapes with natural curvature distributions elicited stronger responses than synthetic shapes with more random distributions, despite having much lower entropy. Remarkably, we also found that natural shapes elicited stronger V4 responses than synthetic shapes with matching curvature statistics, indicating selectivity for non-local shape features. Together, our findings demonstrate for the first time that V4 neurons are tuned to the ecological statistics of both local and non-local object shape not explained by existing models of V4 shape selectivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VisionSame topicMorphological variations and asymmetryFrench-language works237,207