MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386249538 · doi:10.1109/crv60082.2023.00042

CrossMoCo: Multi-Modal Momentum Contrastive Learning for Point Cloud

2023· article· en· W4386249538 on OpenAlexaff
Sneha Paul, Zachary Patterson, Nizar Bouguila

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint cloudComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAutoencoderMachine learningFeature learningDeep learningPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The point cloud is a 3D geometric data that lacks a specific structure and is permutation-invariant. The applications of point clouds have gained significant attention recently in the field of vision tasks. However, most existing works on point clouds utilize supervised learning on large labelled data, which are costly and laborious to collect. To this end, unsupervised learning, for example, self-supervised learning, has shown promising performance in various tasks of 2D computer vision and holds the potential in 3D computer vision applications. In this study, we introduce a novel selfsupervised method called CrossMoCo, which learns the representations of unlabelled point cloud data in a multi-modal setup that also utilizes the 2D rendered images of the point clouds. CrossMoCo outperforms existing methods on multimodal self-supervised learning on point cloud by introducing two new concepts: momentum contrastive learning with more negative samples and multiple-view intra-modal contrastive learning. The first component learns from an online encoder and a momentum encoder with a large number of negative samples, which provides consistent learning signals. The second component enforces consistency between different views of the samples of the same modality, thereby improving multimodal representation. We conduct extensive studies on two popular benchmark datasets (ModelNet40 and ScanObjectNN) for linear classification and few-shot learning tasks. Our results demonstrate that CrossMoCo achieves superior performance over existing methods for both tasks on both datasets, achieving up to 4.36% improvement on linear classification and up to 9.2% on few-shot tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/snehaputul/CrossMoCo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207