MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386250554 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp16693

FlipWalker: Self-Inverting Robot Locomotion Inspired by ‘Jacob’s Ladder’ Falling Block Illusion Toy

2023· article· en· W4386250554 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nia Ralston, Bastiaan Hagen, Phoebe Tan, Matthew Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotServoServomotorScalabilityMicrocontrollerModular designRobustness (evolution)Flexibility (engineering)Computer scienceHingeUnderactuationEngineeringSimulationControl engineeringComputer hardwareArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a novel, underactuated robot locomotion system inspired by the Jacob's Ladder illusion toy, aimed at overcoming challenges encountered by wheeled locomotion on rugged and soft terrains. The system comprises interconnected body segments using flexible wires, offering inherent robustness and scalability due to its simple design. The motion is achieved through servo-controlled rotations, with joint locations adapting as segments pivot around each other. These segments utilize wires as hinges and tension-based constraints, enabling perpetual rotations, thereby propelling the robot forward while remaining flat on the ground. The manufacturing process involves rapid 3D printing for housing and CNC machining for PCB board fabrication. Flexible hinges are attached using threaded bolts, providing tension adjustability. The robot's microcontroller setup involves separate controllers for each body segment, communicating with a central offboard microcontroller for sensor data aggregation, configuration determination, and servo control. This modular design ensures easy addition and removal of segments without disrupting the overall electrical connectivity. The developed locomotion system showcases potential for enhanced adaptability and performance in challenging terrains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207