MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386250716 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.180835

Environmental Sustainability as a Determinant in Career Decisions: An Exploration among Recent University Graduates

2023· article· en· W4386250716 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xin Song

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCareer Development and Diversity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityEngineering ethicsEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amid escalating global environmental challenges, sustainability has crystallized as a central tenet in modern society.Understanding the integration of environmental sustainability in the career decisions of the nascent workforce holds substantial implications for businesses, educators, and policymakers.Through a confluence of quantitative survey techniques and qualitative deep-dive interviews, data were gathered from 1,200 recent university alumni across Beijing, Tianjin, Shijiazhuang, Hangzhou, and Shenzhen.Of those interviewed, 72.5% noted that environmental sustainability played a substantial, if not pivotal, role in their career determinations.Notably, those placing a premium on sustainability displayed an increased inclination towards industries and organizations intrinsically associated with environmental and social responsibility.This investigation, by offering both theoretical and empirical insights, pioneers the examination of the influence of environmental sustainability on career preferences from the lens of the emerging workforce.The insights proffered might enable corporations and recruitment firms to finely tune their talent acquisition strategies, aligning with the aspirations and ethos of the contemporary generation.Simultaneously, the results can guide educators and policymakers in refining vocational education and direction, ensuring alignment with societal sustainability goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicCareer Development and DiversityFrench-language works237,207