MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386250779 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.180810

The Role of Islamic Work Ethics and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Green Human Resource Practices and Environmental Performance of Indonesian Food SMEs

2023· article· en· W4386250779 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alpon Satrianto, Mia Ayu Gusti, Nurtati Nurtati

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndonesianIslamOrganizational citizenship behaviorBusinessWork (physics)CitizenshipHuman resourcesHuman resource managementEnvironmental economicsKnowledge managementOrganizational commitmentPolitical sciencePublic relationsEngineeringGeographyEconomicsComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the food processing sector generate waste and exhaust emissions from food residue burning, and consume excessive electrical energy during cooking, leading to environmental pollution and damage.This study proposes the application of Green Human Resource Management (GHRM) practices (e.g., selection, training, performance management, and compensation) and Organizational Citizenship Behavior towards the Environment (OCBE) to improve the Environmental Performance (EP) of food processing SMEs, with the implementation of Islamic Work Ethics (IWE) as a driving factor.Utilizing a purposive sampling method, a total of 500 owners of food processing SMEs in West Sumatra, Indonesia were selected as research samples.The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling.The study's findings demonstrate that OCBE fully mediates the relationship between IWE and EP.These insights are crucial for helping food processing SMEs to enhance their environmental protection efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207