MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386250852 · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c04928

Unraveling Sodium-Ion Dynamics in Honeycomb-Layered Na<sub>2</sub>Mg<sub><i>x</i></sub>Zn<sub>2–<i>x</i></sub>TeO<sub>6</sub> Solid Electrolytes with Solid-State NMR

2023· article· en· W4386250852 on OpenAlexafffund
Diganta Sarkar, Amit Bhattacharya, Jan Meyer, Anna Maria Kirchberger, Vidyanshu Mishra, Tom Nilges, Vladimir K. Michaelis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta InnovatesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsChemistryFast ion conductorSolid solutionIonSodiumElectrolyteInorganic chemistryCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Physical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All-solid-state sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have the potential to offer large-scale, safe, cost-effective, and sustainable energy storage solutions by supplementing the industry-leading lithium-ion batteries. However, for the enhanced bulk properties of SIB components (e.g., solid electrolytes), a comprehensive understanding of their atomic-scale structure and the dynamic behavior of sodium (Na) ions is essential. Here, we utilize a robust multinuclear ( 23 Na, 125 Te, 25 Mg, and 67 Zn) magnetic resonance approach to explore a novel Mg/Zn homogeneously mixed-cation honeycomb-layered oxide Na 2 Mg x Zn 2– x TeO 6 solid solution series. These new intermediate compounds exhibit tailorable bulk Na-ion conductivity (σ) with the highest σ = 0.14 × 10 –4 S cm –1 for Na 2 MgZnTeO 6 at room temperature suitable for SIB solid electrolyte applications as observed by powder electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). A combination of powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) reveals highly crystalline phase-pure compounds in the P 6 3 22 space group. We show that the Mg/Zn disorder is random within the honeycomb layers using 125 Te nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and resolve multiple Na sites using two-dimensional (triple-quantum magic-angle spinning (3QMAS)) 23 Na NMR. The medium-range disorder in the honeycomb layer is revealed through the combination of 25 Mg and 67 Zn NMR, complemented by electronic structure calculations using density functional theory (DFT). Furthermore, we expose very fast local Na-ion hopping processes (hopping rate, 1/τ NMR = 0.83 × 10 9 Hz) by using a laser to achieve variable high-temperature (∼860 K) 23 Na NMR, which are sensitive to different Mg/Zn ratios. The Na 2 MgZnTeO 6 with maximum Mg/Zn disorder displays the highest short-range Na-ion dynamics among all of the solid solution members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207