MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A numerical study of the transient natural convective heat transfer from thin, horizontal, isothermal plates of different shapes in lower Rayleigh number regime

2023· preprint· en· W4386251242 on OpenAlexaff
Koustav Bandyopadhyay, Patrick H. Oosthuizen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNusselt numberNatural convectionRayleigh numberMechanicsHeat transferThermal conductionIsothermal processHeat transfer coefficientThermodynamicsConvectionMaterials scienceReynolds numberPhysicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural convective heat transfer is of paramount importance in cooling of low power electronic devices or devices in a restricted space. In the current study, unsteady natural convective heat transfer from both sides of thin, isothermal, horizontal plates of simple and complex shapes have been numerically investigated. The plates at 400K were exposed to air at ambient conditions. The Boussinesq approximation was adopted, i.e., all fluid properties, except density, were assumed to be constant. The simulation models were solved using the commercial CFD software ANSYS FLUENT. Mean heat transfer rates from the upper and lower surfaces of the plate were calculated using three length scales namely; width of the plate, square root of single side surface area and 4*Total area/Total perimeter and were expressed in terms of the transient Nusselt number for the Rayleigh numbers ranging between 10 2 to 10 5 . At the lowest Rayleigh number, the heat transfer was found to be primarily through conduction. At higher Rayleigh numbers, the Nusselt number first decreased to a minimum and then increased to the steady state value, indicating a combined process of conduction and convection. Unlike width and root area, 4A/P as the characteristic length scale yielded transient Nusselt number variation, largely independent of plate shape and size. The minor variations of heat transfer amongst plates of different shapes at higher Rayleigh numbers has been explained in terms of the pressure coefficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207