Developing AKM-like English Reading Literacy for EFL Students
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted to develop AKM-like English reading literacy for EFL students and to reveal the different reading strategies. The researchers went through preliminary and formative stages using a development study design. The study generated valid, practical, and potentially AKM-like English reading literacy effects for EFL students. The product satisfies the criteria of validity, practicability, and effectiveness. The students were motivated, engaged, and challenged as the potential effect of the assessment. Most students had high critical reading skills in accessing, retrieving, interpreting, integrating, evaluating, and reflecting on the AKM-like English reading literacy test. The study also revealed that the students used a schemata theory in developing their critical reading ability. To improve students' critical reading literacy and introduce different reading comprehension techniques, EFL teachers should use appropriate types of texts to select students' contextualized world topics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it