Nonlinear Trend and Multiscale Variability of Dry Spells in Senegal (1951–2010)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dry spells occurring during the rainy season have significant implications for agricultural productivity and socioeconomic development, particularly in rainfed agricultural countries such as Senegal. This study employs various chaos-theory-based tools, including the lacunarity method, rescaled analysis, and the improved complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (ICEEMDAN) method, to investigate the distribution, predictability, and multiscale properties of the annual series of maximum dry spell length (AMDSL) in Senegal during the rainy season. The analysis focuses on 29 stations across Senegal, spanning the period from 1951 to 2010. The findings reveal persistent behavior in the AMDSL across nearly all stations, indicating that predictive models based on extrapolating past time trends could enhance AMDSL forecasting. Furthermore, a well-defined spatial distribution of the lacunarity exponent β is observed, which exhibits a discernible relationship with rainfall patterns in Senegal. Notably, the lacunarity exponent displays a south-to-north gradient for all thresholds, suggesting its potential for distinguishing between different drought regimes and zones while aiding in the understanding of spatiotemporal rainfall variability patterns. Moreover, the analysis identifies five significant intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) characterized by different periods, including interannual, interdecadal, and multidecadal oscillations. These IMFs, along with a nonlinear trend, are identified as the driving forces behind AMDSL variations in Senegal. Among the inter-annual oscillations, a 3-year quasi-period emerges as the primary contributor and main component influencing AMDSL variability. Additionally, four distinct morphological types of nonlinear trends in AMDSL variations are identified, with increasing–decreasing and increasing trends being the most prevalent. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the variability in annual maximum dry spell lengths, particularly in the context of climate change, and provide valuable insights for improving AMDSL forecasting. Overall, this study enhances our comprehension of the complex dynamics underlying dry spell occurrences during the rainy season and presents potential avenues for predicting and managing the AMDSL in Senegal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".