Developing an AI-Assisted Educational Chatbot for Radiotherapy Using the IBM Watson Assistant Platform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to make radiotherapy knowledge regarding healthcare accessible to the general public by developing an AI-powered chatbot. The interactive nature of the chatbot is expected to facilitate better understanding of information on radiotherapy through communication with users. Methods: Using the IBM Watson Assistant platform on IBM Cloud, the chatbot was constructed following a pre-designed flowchart that outlines the conversation flow. This approach ensured the development of the chatbot with a clear mindset and allowed for effective tracking of the conversation. The chatbot is equipped to furnish users with information and quizzes on radiotherapy to assess their understanding of the subject. Results: By adopting a question-and-answer approach, the chatbot can engage in human-like communication with users seeking information about radiotherapy. As some users may feel anxious and struggle to articulate their queries, the chatbot is designed to be user-friendly and reassuring, providing a list of questions for the user to choose from. Feedback on the chatbot’s content was mostly positive, despite a few limitations. The chatbot performed well and successfully conveyed knowledge as intended. Conclusions: There is a need to enhance the chatbot’s conversation approach to improve user interaction. Including translation capabilities to cater to individuals with different first languages would also be advantageous. Lastly, the newly launched ChatGPT could potentially be developed into a medical chatbot to facilitate knowledge transfer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".