MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386256600 · doi:10.32920/24050727.v1

Neural Network Based Recursive Least Square Technique for Indoor Wireless Positioning

2023· preprint· en· W4386256600 on OpenAlexaff
Bhagawat Adhikari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrilaterationMultilaterationMean squared errorIndoor positioning systemComputer scienceAlgorithmArtificial neural networkNoise (video)Position (finance)WirelessMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsTriangulationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Location Based Services (LBS) in the realms of Smart City realizations require accurate real time positioning information of objects and people indoors. Both VLC based and the RF based positioning techniques have been studied in the literature. In RF system, we use Recursive Least Square (RLS) multilateration algorithm to estimate the position of unknown target indoor. The RLS multilateration algorithm is based on the trilateration solution using algebraic method. Solution obtained from the trilateration is used in RLS algorithm and the solution is updated recursively. Since Machine Learning (ML) is one of the widely used approaches to improve the accuracy in indoor positioning, we have used Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to fine tune the simulated distances with Rician noise. Therefore, the proposed technique hybridizes RLS with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to solve a multilateration problem of different sets of anchor nodes. We use MATLABTM for the simulation purpose. While simulating distances, Rician noise is considered for anchor-target distance and, noisy distances are fed into ANN filter. Instead of using directly simulated distances, estimated distances from ANN are used for RLS implementation. Results from the hybrid RLS-ANN are compared with pure RLS, pure least square (LS) and LS-ANN approaches. Hybrid RLS-ANN provides the least Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) among all the techniques and improves the accuracy up to 80% compared to the pure LS multilateration technique. Complexity of the proposed technique is relatively low with significantly increased accuracy. We also compare the results with different sets of anchor nodes for RLS implementation. Hybrid RLS-ANN algorithm is used for anchor nodes N = 4 to N = 10. Comparing the results, it has been shown that as the number of anchor nodes increases, the RMSE decreases steadily. RLS multilateration with large number of anchor nodes performs better than LS multilateration. On the other hand, distance error is largely reduced by using ANN training and RLS with ANN estimated distances further improves the accuracy. In VLC system, we analyze the impact of SNR on indoor positioning. VLC indoor positioning is analyzed based on SNR distribution on the room indoor. Distance measurement is analyzed with three parameters: angle of incidence, angle of irradiance and transmitter FOV. Since SNR has the direct impact on the VLC indoor distance measurement, a comparative study of the SNR variation with respect to transmitter FOV, receiver FOV, angles of incidence and irradiance is presented, and corresponding distance measurement error is analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207