MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386256790 · doi:10.32920/24050721.v1

Fault Detection Under Uncertainty in Active Hybrid Distribution Networks

2023· preprint· en· W4386256790 on OpenAlexaff
Shahram Negari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectricity Theft Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservabilityDistributed generationComputer scienceProbabilistic logicSmart gridGridConvertersActive networkingDistributed computingEngineeringVoltageArtificial intelligenceRenewable energyMathematicsElectrical engineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary distribution networks incorporate Distributed Energy Resources (DER) and encompass both AC and DC systems interfaced with various types of power electronic converters. These active hybrid networks are the new norm in generating, distributing, and consuming electric energy in a sustainable manner, hence being integral to the holistic concept of the Smart Grid that aims for goals like self-awareness, high resiliency, self-healing, and bidirectionality of energy flow. Achieving these objectives, however, requires collecting and communicating real-time information to estimate the system state with high accuracy and low latency, and quickly discover potential faults or malfunctions. Even though partial observability has always been a prevalent challenge in distribution grids, active hybrid distribution networks are wreaked by further sources of uncertainty including inherent stochasticity of DER generation, inclusion of non-linear power electronic converters that interface DER with the grid, heterogeneity of AC and DC systems, and finally receiving noisy or potentially corrupt data. Therefore, improved fault detection schemes must be capable to handle uncertainty, as conventional zonal protection schemes are less reliable once applied to active hybrid distribution networks (AHDN). The proposed novel methodology in this research relies on retaining a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) paradigm for decision making under uncertainty which enhances the performance of existing relaying and protection schemes. AHDN is a multivariate dynamic system; thus, it can be efficiently analyzed by resorting to probabilistic graphical model formalism. A factor graph representation (FG) has been used to pass messages among cluster nodes. Furthermore, to collect causal data, a distributed state estimation (DSE) has been employed, where deviation of state variables within their probability distribution function (PDF) signals a likely fault. To feed the graph with correlational evidence, the data collected from IoT sensors are exploited. Since phasor measurement units (PMU) and DSE algorithm are used to compute state variables, the proposed methodology spans over the inherent heterogeneity of AC and DC agents. Additionally, because both the magnitude of anomalies or abrupt changes and their trajectory are used to detect faults, thus shifts towards PDF mean are eliminated to reduce false positive rate (FPR). The proposed methodology is intended to accompany and enhance conventional protection schemes as outlined in IEEE standards 1547 and 2030 for DER interconnection. The method is mainly a decision-making process for detecting and locating faults, and it can be successfully applied to both passive and active networks. It functions well without a priori knowledge about the bonding and grounding scheme and whether the neutral is earthed or not; the latter has been a source of difficulty in islanded microgrids. Furthermore, the proposed technique can identify low and high impedance faults within the range of 0.1 pu to 10 pu, and it discerns open circuit faults whenever possible. Due to its scalability, the proposed method can be applied to larger systems with various measurement sources. The purported fault detection scheme has been simulated in MATLAB / SIMULINK environment. After verifying the concept, the model has been applied to an experimental test bench which has been developed and validated by the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) to compare and establish the results. Then it is implemented in an augmented version of IEEE 13- bus to corroborate its functionality and illustrate the outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectricity Theft Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207