Fault Detection Under Uncertainty in Active Hybrid Distribution Networks
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Contemporary distribution networks incorporate Distributed Energy Resources (DER) and encompass both AC and DC systems interfaced with various types of power electronic converters. These active hybrid networks are the new norm in generating, distributing, and consuming electric energy in a sustainable manner, hence being integral to the holistic concept of the Smart Grid that aims for goals like self-awareness, high resiliency, self-healing, and bidirectionality of energy flow. Achieving these objectives, however, requires collecting and communicating real-time information to estimate the system state with high accuracy and low latency, and quickly discover potential faults or malfunctions. Even though partial observability has always been a prevalent challenge in distribution grids, active hybrid distribution networks are wreaked by further sources of uncertainty including inherent stochasticity of DER generation, inclusion of non-linear power electronic converters that interface DER with the grid, heterogeneity of AC and DC systems, and finally receiving noisy or potentially corrupt data. Therefore, improved fault detection schemes must be capable to handle uncertainty, as conventional zonal protection schemes are less reliable once applied to active hybrid distribution networks (AHDN). The proposed novel methodology in this research relies on retaining a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) paradigm for decision making under uncertainty which enhances the performance of existing relaying and protection schemes. AHDN is a multivariate dynamic system; thus, it can be efficiently analyzed by resorting to probabilistic graphical model formalism. A factor graph representation (FG) has been used to pass messages among cluster nodes. Furthermore, to collect causal data, a distributed state estimation (DSE) has been employed, where deviation of state variables within their probability distribution function (PDF) signals a likely fault. To feed the graph with correlational evidence, the data collected from IoT sensors are exploited. Since phasor measurement units (PMU) and DSE algorithm are used to compute state variables, the proposed methodology spans over the inherent heterogeneity of AC and DC agents. Additionally, because both the magnitude of anomalies or abrupt changes and their trajectory are used to detect faults, thus shifts towards PDF mean are eliminated to reduce false positive rate (FPR). The proposed methodology is intended to accompany and enhance conventional protection schemes as outlined in IEEE standards 1547 and 2030 for DER interconnection. The method is mainly a decision-making process for detecting and locating faults, and it can be successfully applied to both passive and active networks. It functions well without a priori knowledge about the bonding and grounding scheme and whether the neutral is earthed or not; the latter has been a source of difficulty in islanded microgrids. Furthermore, the proposed technique can identify low and high impedance faults within the range of 0.1 pu to 10 pu, and it discerns open circuit faults whenever possible. Due to its scalability, the proposed method can be applied to larger systems with various measurement sources. The purported fault detection scheme has been simulated in MATLAB / SIMULINK environment. After verifying the concept, the model has been applied to an experimental test bench which has been developed and validated by the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) to compare and establish the results. Then it is implemented in an augmented version of IEEE 13- bus to corroborate its functionality and illustrate the outcome.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».