Combining Artificial Immune System and Clustering Analysis: A Stock Market Anomaly Detection Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As online trading systems have increased the amount of high volume, real-time data transactions, the stock market continues to have increased vulnerability to attacks. The goal of this project is to detect these attacks based on normal trade behavior using an Artificial Immune System (AIS) approach combined with clustering algorithms. The AIS approach is inspired by its proven ability to handle time-series data as well as its ability to detect abnormal behavior while only being trained on regular trade behavior. These two main points are important as the models need to be able to adapt over time to adjust to normal trade behavior as it evolves and also due to confidentiality and data restrictions, real-world manipulations are not available for training. This proposed research work discovers a competitive alternative to the leading AIS approach and investigates the effects of combining AIS with clustering algorithms including Kernel Density Estimation, Self-Organized Maps, Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise, Cluster-Based Local Outlier Factor, and Spectral clustering. The best performing solution achieves leading performance in terms of many common clustering metrics including Area Under the Curve, False Alarm Rate, False Negative Rate, and Computation Time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".